Moral Excuses for Doing the Wrong Thing A story published today (8/25/06) at Keynoter.com and in the news nationwide, shines a bright spotlight, at least in my mind, on the sad state of a society (any society) that is controlled by religion rather than logic and common sense. Here is a bit of the article:
"A California biotech company has developed a way to generate human embryonic stem cell colonies without intentionally destroying embryos in the process. Lead researcher Robert Lanza of Advanced Cell Technology declared Wednesday that "this removes the last rational reason for opposing" research aimed at using the cells to understand and treat diseases. Lanza's optimism was not widely shared. His team earned praise for trying to address ethical concerns and for technical prowess. But opponents of embryonic stem cell research said the new approach still poses moral dilemmas." (emphasis mine)The "moral dilemmas" are, of course, the inventions of religious conservatives. Logically speaking, there is not a reason left to oppose this research but yet these religious conservatives are trying to convince the world that their opposition (based on faith, not reason) is the morally correct response. Forget the fact that no embryo will be harmed or that this research may someday produce treatments for diseases such as Parkinsons and Alzheimer's -- focus instead on the 'moral dilemma' that has religious conservatives quivering in their pews. As Dr. Yaron Brook, executive director of the Ayn Rand Institute says: "It is a mistake to try to appease religious conservatives on this issue. What they are opposed to, fundamentally, is science . . .". I started this post with the suggestion that this country is being "controlled" by a religion and while controlled may be too strong a word TODAY . . . it may be just the right word tomorrow.




3 Comments:
Thanks for dropping by and regurgitating the latest Bush talking points about "the world in which we live", and the latest Freeper/LGF talking points cleverly claiming that if we just slaughtered more Muslims, they'd see how much we want them to have freedom, and all would be well.
I bet, with the paucity of people enlisting so bad that 16 and 17 year-olds are being hustled by recruiters, that you'd be a great example of a patriotic conservative who saw a need for courage and sacrifice on the battlefield.
Do it. Enlist.
Otherwise, you're just part of the ever-dwindling group with genocidal solutions to everything.
Have a great weekend.
jamesraven,
It was a pleasure to drop by and attempt to add some light to your unenlightened corner of the world. Someone had to do it and your regular readers are, no doubt, following the leader.
BTW: I did my service in Viet Nam and (do the math) that would make me a tad too old to enlist but BE SURE that if the opportunity ever arose for an old man to do his part in ridding the world of that radical rubbish -- I'll be there!
Just to make the record clear -- I realize that the "enemy" is only a small portion of the Moslim world -- it's too bad that the larger portion can't get their act together and take out their own garbage.
Okay, there may be some middle ground here, but I'm not positive of that.
First and foremost, thank you for your service to America. I was a Reservist at the time and got thrown out for mental health reasons; in my case they weren't a ruse. Now people as ill as I once was are recruited for duty in Iraq.
So do we stand on either side of the rhetorical fence and lob verbal grenades back and forth or is there some kind of area we could exist in that celebrates some common theme?
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home